Thursday, October 17, 2013

Blog Stg.4


        In the article “It Depends on What the Meaning of 'Settled Law' is,” written in the Ann Coulter blog, Ann rips apart the political bias and injustices in our government. She is extremely on point. Ann’s statements which have potential for collaboration, looks very much like the statements that are on leftist issues. This blog post is to inform the American people. Her posts also seem more like attacks than points for discussion, but she is again: right. Although her credibility is flawed with certain groups, she speaks her mind, and on the truth. She is widely followed by people of the same ideology as herself, and she obviously does her homework.


The good news for the GOP is that Obamacare can never be anything but devastation for over ninety percent of the American people. That law is written so that nobody (other than crooked politicians and insurance companies) will or can experience anything good. When Coulter wrote, “Liberals will fight until they get their way -- and, as soon as they do, they announce their one victory is "settled law," helped demonstrate the eagerness of the liberal party to get their way and how they rub it in America’s face. I like how Coulter has many examples of the crappy job the government is doing at keeping justice for the people. The most likely outcome is that, this law will generate so much hate towards Democrats, that if the GOP plays its cards right, it will be able to destroy the Democratic Party forever. Unless the Democrats are destroyed, there will never be a return to godliness, freedom, civil rights and human rights in America.

Everything wrong is right, and everything right is wrong. Obama should be dragged out of the house and imprisoned for high treason against the citizens of the United States. He does not follow the constitution at all, he breaks it every chance he gets. Coulter shows this point of view when she writes, “When Republicans won't give up on an issue, it is because they are defending the will of the people, not pushing some harebrained scheme cooked up by a small group of zealots and imposed on the nation by an activist judge or freak Congress.” Very well said Coulter. We will not have our freedom much longer if we continue to comply and allow their (liberals) crap to be reality. There is power in numbers but only if the numbers stand together which we (the numbers,) are not. He is out to kill the middle class. He is a tyrant, and when things do not go his way he acts outraged and displays traits of a dictator. A good example of this is the government shut down. He punishes The People. For instance, our parks, monuments and etc. were shut down.

Coulter clearly is anti-liberal and wants a justified government. Not only did she address this issue with confidence, and legitimacy, but with the people of the U.S. in mind. This article is to all the American people, to not only enlighten them, but if they are liberal to let them know that she will not submit to their level.

Monday, October 7, 2013

Stage 3


I read an article in the Washington Post  named, “Why pro-lifers keep fighting abortion,” written by Helen M. and Meg T. McDonnell on March 01, 2013. In this article, they are trying it show why abortion should not be legal. Their reasoning is that it could potentially violate standards of marriage and respect for life. This is very well true. The way they are trying to justify their pro-life views starts off with a question saying “Why don’t we lay down our signs, cease our marching and admit that we’ve been good and beaten for these 40 years since Roe v. Wade?” They then answer their own question by saying their views can help others understand and consider aspects of the U.S. experience when it comes to abortion. They proceed by giving the reader seven reasons why pro-life people of America stand their ground. This article was specific to those who are riding the fence when it comes to abortion, and their purpose is to win over their non-approval and deepen the reader's understanding of abortion.  As far as credibility goes, they do use statistics and numbers to prove their point, as well as history, scientific journals and past studies done on woman who have had abortions. The one thing they could have done better to make their argument even more convincing would be to use more substantial evidence. The logic and strategic way they wrote out the seven points to describe their take on abortion was nicely done. However, the explanations and facts could have been written more precisely. I did like the fact that they mentioned the problems occurring with the lower economic class and in minorities because of abortion. In their sixth point, I feel that they could have expanded the depth of their details when it came to the after-affects of having an abortion, such as mental health problems and higher risks of substance abuse, instead of just briefly mentioning it. This could have increased negative emotions in the reader and made their argument stronger. The article would have been accurate enough if .....they were talking to people who were already pro-life, but seeing as to how their demographic is people who are riding the fence and opposing  the issue of abortion, it does not suffice. In conclusion it is a well written article but does not do what it was intended to do, to persuade.